Paraletteratura: i limiti di un concetto critico nella definizione dei generi letterari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14672/20253094Keywords:
Paraliterature, Genre fiction, Literary genre, Science fiction, Contemporary fictionAbstract
In Italy, genre fiction has long been dismissed as a marginal literary form, and the full range of its manifestations has been labelled paraliterature, a term that often generates misunderstanding and confusion. This paper argues that such a view (and division) is not only extremely limited, and limiting, when it comes to addressing the complexity of literary phenomena, but also that, by focusing solely on the literary dimension of genre, it fails to account for the complex features that genre has acquired in the present. The first part of this paper examines a number of critical works that, in France and Italy, make a distinction between “proper” literature and paraliterature (Ricci, Rak, Spinazzola, Couégnas, Simonetti). By using science fiction as a case study and adopting the frameworks proposed by John Rieder and Damien Broderick, the second part explores alternative definitions of the concept of genre that include an understanding of its complexity, its transmedia dimension, and the publishing and material dynamics underlying its production.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Tutto il contenuto del sito, compresi gli articoli della rivista, sono licenziati secondo una Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License, eccetto dove espressamente indicato.
Gli autori mantengono il copyright sui propri articoli e materiali supplementari senza restrizioni e mantengono il diritto di pubblicazione senza restrizioni.
